The Daily Nexus endorses Carlos “Andy” Ruiz — a fourth-year sociology major with the experience and vision to carry UCSB through its third presidency of the 2020-21 academic year — for Associated Students president in this week’s special election.
Ruiz is running against Lea Toubian, a fourth-year political science and environmental studies double major. Former Associated Students (A.S.) President Daevionne Beasley resigned in October amid a sexual assault allegation and recall effort against him. Internal Vice President Tianna White stepped in as interim president shortly after until a special election could be held this quarter.
Amid the new normal of the pandemic for UCSB students, Ruiz laid out a comprehensive but realistic plan to specifically assist and advocate for marginalized communities who are most affected by the pandemic.
“I want to use my experiences that I have, not just with A.S., but as a community member myself and someone who’s [been] impacted a lot when it comes to marginalized communities,” Ruiz said. “I want to use that to further fuel my presidential campaign in a way that I can reach out to these communities and let them know that I speak for them because I’ve been there and I am willing to listen [to] what we all need.”
Both Ruiz and Toubian are exceptionally qualified for the position and have the ability to carry the office through the end of its term in the spring. While Ruiz has been the deputy chief of staff for the External Vice President for Local Affairs (EVPLA) for the past two years, Toubian is the current chief of staff for the office of the president, which could mean a quicker transition time if she was elected, as she said in her interview.
But the A.S. president is meant to serve and represent all students, not just those in A.S. We believe the scope of her platform focuses too heavily on fixing problems within the association rather than addressing the student body as a whole.
Toubian specifically mentioned she wanted to “rebuild and repair a lot of the hurt that’s been done in the association,” citing the “toxicity” and “dark sides” she has witnessed in A.S. While this is an admirable goal, it should not be one of the top priorities for a president at a time when students are struggling to adapt to remote learning, need access to in-person and online resources, and are dealing with the impact of COVID-19.
When asked about how to reach out to students outside of A.S., Toubian pointed to the A.S. Pearman Fellowship, which teaches first- and second-year students about the A.S. by pairing them to one of the five executive offices. Toubian said that the fellows would help her access new circles of people and communities, but students in the fellowship make up only a fraction of the student body. Fellows already have a clear interest in A.S., while many students remain unaware of the resources available to them through the president’s office.
When Ruiz was asked the same question, he said his office would focus its outreach on first-year and international students who are unfamiliar with the campus or I.V. Ruiz said his outreach would be done through counselors and professors who teach freshman-level courses in order to promote various A.S. resources through both targeted emails and class presentations.
Toubian also mentioned putting efforts toward the creation of an A.S. Voices Scholarship, which would provide aid for low-income students involved in A.S., in addition to the existing stipends. While A.S. students shouldn’t have to choose between being a part of A.S. and their financial stability, there are students across campus who have lost jobs because of the pandemic and are struggling to get by.
Toubian is the co-chair of the A.S. COVID-19 Task Force, which has put a significant amount of money back into the hands of students during the pandemic via A.S. funds allocated through the executive office and various boards, commissions and units (BCUs).
Both candidates support increasing on-campus COVID-19 testing and opening up some spaces on campus, but Ruiz’s plan is more targeted to specific, vital student resources. He plans to focus on re-opening the A.S. Pardall Center, which provides student employment and resources such as WiFi, printing, scanning, and access to first aid kits and contraceptives.
Additionally, Ruiz says he will advocate for administrators to reopen parts of the University Library, which he said is “key for academic success.” He specifically plans to push for more in-person textbook rentals and scanning to be available, and said he will advocate for online textbook options and digital course readers.
“I know students have issues with getting textbooks, [and] not everyone has a printing station at home. Sometimes people can’t do remote learning; sometimes people live in a house full of eight, nine, ten people and they can’t study at home,” Ruiz said.
“The Pardall Center and [University] Library are resources that I would like to see open available for students, because I feel like just wishing everyone the best and hoping that they stay safe through an email every now and then is not effective.”
In light of the sexual assault allegation which preceded Beasley’s resignation, the needs of survivors of sexual assault have been at the forefront of this election. Toubian said she will invite student organizations that support survivors of sexual assault, A.S. leaders and Greek life organizations to meet together to address issues within student government and UCSB as a whole.
Ruiz directly refuted this strategy in his interview.
“I just feel like when it comes to survivors, oftentimes they’re forced to meet and out themselves,” he said. “And it kind of alludes to putting them in vulnerable positions with people who oftentimes don’t respect them or adhere to what their needs are, so when it comes to like survivors and Greek [life] community, I mean, there’s a long history there.”
Ruiz said that he sees supporting survivors not just as a platform, but as “something that I incorporate into my everyday ideals.” He said he plans to meet with organizations including Students Against Sexual Assault and Standing Together to End Sexual Assault, to be an ally to “hold the administration accountable when it comes to the promises that they give.”
Another policy to support survivors that Toubian mentioned is to “bar those accused of sexual assault from running for student government,” which she cited as “tangible change that can be made [and] that can be quickly implemented” through A.S. Senate and A.S. Elections Board.
A.S. Legal Code does not specifically prevent this policy, but the Nexus doubts the feasibility of preventing a student from running for office without due process and a formal decision from Title IX or another local jurisdiction.
Toubian said that former President Beasley has been one of her friends since freshman year, and Beasley first hired her as his chief of staff last summer. She said that in her role as chief of staff, and if elected as president, she would put the needs of the student body first “completely aside from that relationship.”
While both candidates have years of experience in various A.S. offices, there’s no denying that Toubian’s resume speaks for itself. As the former chief of staff of the Internal Vice President (IVP), co-chair of the A.S. COVID-19 Task Force and current chief of staff of the president, she may be able to more seamlessly navigate the transition. In fact, she said a large reason why she’s running is because she was “the backbone” behind the transition from Beasley to current interim President Tianna White, and she “[doesn’t] think the office can handle another transition.”
If elected, Ruiz would have the power to appoint a new chief of staff. When asked by the Nexus if she would be willing to stay on as chief of staff if Ruiz is elected, Toubian said she’s “not really interested in training and transitioning someone else.”
While it may take more time for Ruiz to fully transition into the role, the Nexus is confident that his years of A.S. experience have prepared him to make that transition quickly and effectively, and his plans for the office outshine Toubian’s plans enough that a longer transitional period is justified.
Glad to see Lea wanted to tackle the toxicity in Associated Students. Most of y’all be acting like you’re the savior UCSB has needed when you’re really not. And most of y’all only “stand up” for sexual assault survivors when it’s convenient for you. Let’s just abolish all of AS already. There’s a reason so many senators have quit. There’s a few of you who make it so so so toxic for everyone else. This isn’t high school. But you’ll learn that once you graduate and realized you peaked in UCSB AS government
Is this the priority right now? The whole recall thing wasted too much time and $$. I don’t care about AS toxicity.
I want UCSB stimulus checks. At least Andy is focused on just basic needs.
The sad thing though, is that Andy isnt going to do anything either. Its probably just a resume-enhancer for him
What makes you say that?
Just conversations i’ve had with a couple of his friends in IVP. Not really genuine at all
Have you personally had a full-blown conversation with Andy? Were you there from the step-by-step process of him deciding to run? I don’t think so. If you actually knew Andy, you’d know he’s one of the few genuine people out there. He actually cares about others and their livelihoods. Yes, no one is perfect and politicians all have a “fake” side, but if you get to know Andy, you would know that this isn’t a resume-enhancer for him.
Yes, I actually have had conversations with him. I first met him when he worked at the Starbucks in the UCen and met him while Daniel was running for President. Haha nah, its all a facade. He has come off as really ingenuine about his run and to be honest, some ppl in IVP come off like that too. Maybe you should spend more time around those circles, and you’ll see what i am talking about
i mean Lea did a lot with the covid 19 task force and getting money in the hands of students. so she’s not just talking about it she is about it
Lea was co- chair of the COVID-19 task force, but majority of the work was die by individual organizations (like SCORE, QComm, Human Rights Board, LaFaDeColores, etc). Let’s give credit where credit is due.
And besides, the task force is a joke. People received their REIMBURSEMENT checks MONTHS after applying, and there still are students who are waiting for $$ although they applied back in SUMMER. It’s inefficient.
Correction; *was done by individual organizations
This is exactly what I was talking about. It was actually UCSB staff that sent out the checks. Of course, typical AS people acting like they are the savior UCSB needs. Get out of here. Everyone in AS is toxic, especially those in IVP.
YES! IVP is shady and their ppl are so much shadier. I hanged out around them a lot and tbh, most of their candidates are sooo 2 faced. Especially their candidates for AP President from the last 4 years, starting with Z.S
Fun fact actually! The COVID 19 task force took over 6 months to get students their checks. Many students depended on receiving that money but rather lost their homes or could not afford to feed themselves…..so the task force really wasn’t shit and Lea essentially did nothing to help students in need
Thank you!! Someone with common understanding.
Seeing Andy dismiss the toxicity that’s very obviously present in AS, as well as that “something I incorporate into my daily ideals” comment seems like he’s going to refrain from doing anything substantive regarding the actual issues at hand. AS as an organization absolutely SHOULD see reform, and it doesn’t seem like Andy wants to do much about it. Neoliberal, pete buttigieg type energy.
Literally. The only noticeable thing I can think of him is being Daniel’s friend (Daniel, the guy that LOST the race last time around).
the toxicity is literally only CU so maybe Lea should focus on the toxic shit that happens within her own party rather than everyone else in AS who is just chillin and ACTUALLY getting work done….like the toxicity that exists is bc of her best friend who has sexual assault allegations….start at home babe
I think it’s not necessarily dismissing the toxicity, but rather FOCUSING on the matters at hand. The current pandemic has heavily affected many students; many of these low-income and marginalized. The position of president will only last 5 months. His priority is assisting to URGENT issues of NOW, but that does not mean he doesn’t believe AS is/can be toxic, nor does it mean he won’t attempt to alleviate such toxicity.
Literally everyone that isn’t clearly an IVP representative (like you) is talking about how toxic AS is- it’s clearly an issue that needs to be brought to light, and FOCUSED on, so everyone’s actually able to work alongside eachother, for the betterment of the community. The decision to not focus on this is a red flag and shows me his crew likely perpetuates it. Be less fake next time and people will trust your party lmao
What exactly HAS he done? He’s all words and no action. I met him when he worked at the Starbucks in the UCen. He was cool and all but he is definitely not prepared to undertake such position, seeing as how he little to no experience in this. Lea most definitely isn’t my cup of tea either, but she has actually worked with admin and has the experience to lead for the next quarter. Anyways, good luck to Lea
Andy is the only candidate that has real plans to help students during this time, Lea is scary crusty vibes and just seems like she just cares about the paycheck more than students who genuinely need help
IVP loves to act like the toxicity comes from CU and their candidates. Even before Lea and Daevionne ran for president, AS was still INFAMOUSLY known to be toxic. I would love the IVP babes try to explain that one? Just gonna blame it more on CU folks? Their failure to recognize their own part in the toxicity in AS is a huge reason of why it will never be addressed properly and fixed. IVP acts like they are so cool and acts like everyone LOVES them, newsflash, no one does. We all see how FAKE all of you guys… Read more »
This campus really needs to have a frank discussion about how CU is influenced by Rabbi Goodman and the Zionist community to run Zionist candidates who do not care about people of color and are prejudiced towards Palestinians. CU would be fine if they just ran their Greek life people because at least they’re not influenced by a religious organization to commit more harm on this campus. And before someone comes screaming about how this is “anti-semitic” please do your fucking homework and realize that being anti-Zionist does not mean anti-Semitic. Of course there should be Jewish representation in AS… Read more »
Hi as a Jewish person on this campus, I am truly asking you to not vote for Lea. She has incredibly violent views about upholding the state of Israel and I’m so scared about what she will do on this campus to students if she is elected. Her Zionist views are very dangerous for us Jews who just want peace and do not want to be divisive on campus. We live in California and there’s no reason for lea to be acting like she’s part of Israel Defense Force.
Wtf is she gonna do in 6 months that’s violent and dangerous? I’m sorry what? I’m Jewish too and this is so extra and has nothing to do with the election. I know her as well and idk what she told you but she’s never had “violent views about upholding the state of Israel” you literally just made this up
So proud of Andy and thankful that the Nexus properly endorsed the best candidate who does not have a separate agenda
i totally vibe with what you all are saying but andy doesn’t know what he’s doing. lol.
Hey campus United and Lea’s friends…how many people or group chats did you ask to spam the comment section bc your friend who literally still is very close with daeviomne didn’t get an endorsement :/
Actually, I am not friends with anyone in CU and I’ve actually ran with IVP in the past for a few years. I’ve known IVP people for years now. As much as IVP likes to demonize CU, CU members aren’t the ones constantly in drama and making life hard for other students. Oh the new little senator from IVP passed a bunch of useless resolutions, yeah it’s because they have no friends to do anything else. So IVP and Jose and all of them can go be performative elsewhere. Jose knows exactly who they are too
oh you’ve ran with IVP? or are you giving yourself fake credentials to make yourself seem worthy enough to make unsubstantial claims about the party? I would love for you to come forward without hiding behind a screen and if you genuinely care about the toxicity of AS, you would bring this up to your party that you have allegedly “ran with” — nice try though!
Oh so people are only worthy when they’ve ran with IVP? Exactly the toxicity I’m talking about. And I have brought it up with IVP. It’s why I didn’t run with them again after I saw how toxic they are. You are proving my point exactly. Jose, we know this is you typing in the comments. Just give it a break already
I’m a woman ????
I’ve only met Andy a couple of times. They have been really nice and sweet. I voted for Lea because the people Andy associates himself with are terrible. There’s a few off campus senators that Andy associates with that are TERRIBLE. It’s why me and my group of friends voted for Lea. We can’t stand IVP and their performative activism.
Did it not matter to you that Lea is still friends with person who has multiple allegations of sexual assault? So much for performative activism.
that part. its scary the amount of damage, toxicity and harmfulness his friends have done to this association. I don’t want someone who associates with people like that to be the president. too divisive, too inexperienced, too self serving. no no no no no no.
I remember the last presidential candidate nexus endorsed lmao