Warning: This article contains graphic content.
A UC Santa Barbara student says that Associated Students President-elect Daevionne Beasley sexually assaulted him in 2018, when both men were freshmen, an allegation that Beasley has denied.
Beasley currently serves as the external vice president for statewide affairs (pictured above being sworn in in 2019) and is scheduled to be sworn in as A.S. president on Wednesday. Andrea Verdugo / Daily Nexus
The male student, a third-year who spoke to the Nexus on the condition of anonymity to protect his privacy, said Beasley had taken him back to Beasley’s dorm room after a party on Feb. 23, 2018, where Beasley had reached into the student’s pants and groped him when he was too drunk to consent.
Two of the student’s friends told the Nexus that they recall the student telling them the next morning that Beasley had made him feel uncomfortable.
The student shared emails showing that he has been in contact with the campus’s Title IX Office over the past two months and is in the process of filing a complaint against Beasley.
After rumors about Beasley’s alleged inappropriate behavior spread earlier this month, a second-year student started a petition to demand a special election to remove Beasley from the position of A.S. president.
Beasley, who currently serves as the external vice president for statewide affairs and is scheduled to be sworn in as A.S. president on Wednesday, has strenuously denied the student’s allegation. Beasley said the two did not have any sexual encounter in his dorm room that night and has welcomed a Title IX investigation into his behavior.
Beasley has called the rumors about his behavior “lies” and said, in a statement to the Nexus, “these false accusations are doing far more than just threatening my presidency; they are attempting to undermine every aspect of my humanity.”
He did not answer many of the specific questions posed by the Nexus about the claims in this article, saying he wanted the Title IX Office to investigate them and that UCSB administrators had “advised party leaders to respect the confidential investigative process of Title IX.”
The student making the allegations said that after the party in 2018, Beasley had insisted on taking him back to Beasley’s dorm room in Anacapa Residence Hall, where Beasley gave him clothes to wear because the student had thrown up and someone had spilled alcohol on him.
The student said he was conscious of what was happening as Beasley began touching him, including under his pants, but that he was close to “blacking out.”
“You know things are happening, but you’re kind of like, at least for me, ‘I’m just gonna let it happen,’ like my body is tired,” the student said, describing his state at the time.
“He started to feel me up, and I really remember him going under my clothes and stuff,” the student said. “I think he might’ve asked me at some point, ‘Oh, like, is this okay?’ But again, all I could do was grunt.”
“I guess he took that as a yes.”
The student said he thinks Beasley may have believed he was acting appropriately, but that the student’s intoxicated state should have made it clear that he was not able to consent.
Both Beasley and the student said Beasley’s two roommates were in the room with them that night. Beasley provided their names and contact information, and the two initially agreed to speak to the Nexus, but one later declined, saying he did not want to interfere with a Title IX investigation, and the other stopped responding to inquiries.
Beasley also provided the names of two other students who he said were with him and the student on the night of the party, but they also declined to speak to the Nexus after initially agreeing to do so. One said she was declining to speak “out of my respect for Daevionne’s wishes.”
Two friends of the student making the accusation said the student had told them, as they discussed the previous night in a dorm room the next morning, that Beasley had made him feel uncomfortable.
One of those friends, a third-year art history major who asked to be identified only by her initials, S.K., said she remembered the student telling them that Beasley had touched him inappropriately the night before.
According to S.K., the student told the two that he had tried to tell Beasley “no,” but that he was so drunk, it was difficult to get the words out.
The other friend, a third-year film and media studies major, said she remembered less about what the student had told her and S.K., but that she remembered him describing an uncomfortable experience with Beasley.
The film and media studies major also said she was with the student on the night of the party and had questioned whether Beasley should take him back to campus, given that the student was “almost sloppy and slurring” because of how drunk he was.
The same friend provided text messages from a week later that showed that the student felt uncomfortable about the idea of being alone with Beasley.
“Erghhh imma try and not b alone with him,” the student texted her on March 2, 2018, after she told him that Beasley had invited her and her friends to a party.
Later that night, when the student texted the same friend and said he was walking home alone through I.V., the woman suggested that he call Beasley. The student wrote in a text that he didn’t want to because “it creeps me out what happened last time i drank with him.”
The student told the Nexus that he confronted Beasley in person about a year later, in February 2019, and said he was “still not okay” with what had happened, referencing the dorm room encounter the previous February. The student said he told Beasley that “what he did was wrong and assault.”
Beasley told the Nexus last month that he believed the student was referring to an earlier incident, in January 2018, in which the two had a sexual encounter while they were both drunk at a UCSB-affiliated conference.
After the confrontation, Beasley reached out to the student, saying that the confrontation was “a little hostile,” but that he hoped to speak with the student further.
“Anyways, I’ve been thinking about what you said, and while I don’t necessarily feel the same way as you did about the situation, I still want to learn why you feel that way,” Beasley wrote in identical messages sent over text and Facebook Messenger, which both parties provided.
“If an apology is needed, then I’d gladly do so 100%,” he continued. “I don’t want anyone in their life to feel violated or neglected or any range of emotions you might have been or are currently feeling.”
The Nexus began investigating claims against Beasley after receiving an anonymous email on April 17 that was also sent to The Bottom Line and the two campus political parties: Isla Vista Party (IVP) and Campus United (CU). Beasley has run with CU for the last two years.
The student, who subsequently came forward to the Nexus, said he was not involved with the letter and does not know who sent it. The Nexus has not been able to identify the sender; the message was sent using Gmail’s confidential email service and could not be replied to.
IVP leadership later published a copy of the letter on its social media platforms on May 2, just over a week after the election ended. Justice Dumlao, a member of the IVP leadership, said the party was not involved with sending the anonymous email.
Dumlao said party leaders had interviewed Beasley as a potential party candidate for A.S. Senate in the spring of 2018, but decided not to slate him after a woman had relayed the sexual encounter that the student had with Beasley at the UCSB-affiliated conference.
The student told the Nexus that what had happened at the conference was consensual, but “creepy.”
“I began the encounter willing, but quickly began to feel uncomfortable and like I was about to pass out,” he said in an email. “Back then I felt that I should be polite so I didn’t say no right away but it was clear that I was extremely drunk.”
Following IVP’s publication of the anonymous letter, Izzy Mitchell, a second-year communications and economics double major, created a petition to recall Beasley from his position. Mitchell said she is not affiliated with IVP or CU.
Mitchell’s petition would need signatures from 10% of students who voted in the Spring 2020 presidential race, which amounts to 542 students, before it would be presented to the A.S. Senate. Then, two-thirds of senators would need to vote in favor of holding a recall election for it to happen.
The petition has over 600 signatures as of Sunday, according to Mitchell. It is unclear how many of those signatures are from students who voted in the presidential election.
Beasley said that he respects students’ right to ask for his recall, but that he has no intention of stepping down. Doing so, he said, would only “affirm these lies.”
Leaders of CU, the party that slated Beasley, said in a Facebook post that they would abide by the results of the Title IX investigation, saying that if “these accusations are proven true” after the investigation, they have “every intention” of disaffiliating with Beasley and calling on him to resign.
“However, we will not irresponsibly discuss unproven allegations,” the party wrote in the statement, “and will not punish anyone based on unsubstantiated claims.”
Mitchell said she agreed Beasley has a right to due process but remained frustrated that most students did not know about the claims against Beasley until after voting ended, despite the anonymous letter being sent to both campus political parties and newspapers.
“I was very frustrated that it is very clear that these emails were sent out to Campus United, to Daily Nexus and Isla Vista Party, and I felt like it was not okay as leaders of our institution to deny the public the right to know that there is something going on,” Mitchell said.
“It is not fair to the student body that after they voted, that this has come up,” she added.
[Updated 7:20 p.m.]: This article has been updated to include the number of signatures on the petition as of Sunday.
Why the fuck is the nexus acting like a court of law. This is a disgrace to survivors at UCSB. You are using this to gain popularity.
The Nexus has a right to publish anything they want so long as it is not libel. The Nexus is simply saying that a sexual assault claim towards the AS President exists and that it may or may not be true. All parties involved were quoted in this article. This is the same as the media covering previous claims against Brett Kavanaugh, Joe Biden, Donald Trump, and Roy Moore.
This article isn’t giving a judgement, just stating facts. That’s what a news organization is for lmao I don’t get your outrage.
But what if we don’t like knowledge?
Everyone in AS is corrupt. Fuck the system. If it turns out he got a little horny and put his hands on someone to get a loud out, I wouldn’t be surprised. If he was white he’d already be labeled as a sex offender. Dumbass wannabe student politicians. How many ex-AS members made it big? Pretty sure it’s 0. Politicians don’t get famous by being saints, it’s all about sucking each other off to get to the top. Bill Clinton is your prime example. If you’re in AS congrats you got yourself a resume builder, but other than that you’re… Read more »
I honestly cannot believe Nexus thought it was okay to post something like this. Especially if, as they say, a Title IX investigation is underway. This is interference and spreading potentially untrue and currently unsubstantiated allegations and for what? Clout? To stay relevant? This is so harmful to so many parties, including all the survivors at UCSB. Nexus has no right to be involving themselves in this. Unprofessional.
The student body deserves to know and also there’s no need for an investigation because WE BELIEVE SURVIVORS.
Oh yes there needs to be an investigation and if found guilty chuck the bloody book at them. To re-conciliate our ideals of innocence until proven otherwise, and us believing survivors; we need to support survivors albeit not unconditionally.
Yeah! Same goes for Trump and Biden! Men totally don’t deserve to have any information about their allegations out in the open before an election! #MakeAmericaGreatAgain
Thank you Nexus for posting this so people can stay informed and know what’s going on. It’s wild that people weren’t made aware of these allegations during or even before elections.
This is disgraceful. Using people’s sexual assault allegations to advance your own political agenda is so low. And for what? To hurt someone else’s reputation? To feel better about your self? This is not helping communities or representing people. This is putting people down and hurting others to advance your own interests. This is why the Progressive movement is failing. Shit like this only hurts us. The Nexus an IVP should both be ashamed of what you are doing here. Despicable journalism and despicable politics.
what an interesting way to say “f*ck survivors”
Not at all. I think we should believe survivors. But why should we believe them over anyone else? Whys is Beasley’s accusor automatically right just because he claims to have been sexually assaulted? He absolutely might have been sexually assaulted, I’m not denying that. But I’m also not going to jump and point fingers just because someone said something. It’s not a secret that people lie all the time about being sexually assaulted. In this case, perhaps they are lying perhaps they are not — there is potential evidence that would point to lying. But only a court of law… Read more »
So we should put our heads in the sand and have it remain “super confidential”? Would you prefer we knew nothing about Trump and Biden’s allegations before an election? Nobody is saying we believe survivors over anyone else, we simply want transparency for the campus free information. It’s strange that people are fighting that so much.
The truth should come out. All allegations should surface we should be aware of everything. But that doesn’t mean we should be making decisions based off allegations. That’s where it gets dangerous. Just because some random dude accused Beasley CU should now automatically not slate him he should be canceled completely. There’s literally no evidence no proof and a potential political bias. Like it could all be true. But people shouldn’t make decisions to remove people from office or not slate because of a fucking allegation. Like anyone can make an allegation!! That literally is what happens today if someone… Read more »
Lol this world does not believe survivors…lmk what simulation you are in
I don’t believe he should be removed from office, however, the issue was going on before voting occurred and was kept “confidential” when it should have been an issue that the public knows about as it would probably influence their decisions. The same goes for how everyone else within the party systems is treating the topic, people’s statements on the topic matter when they are discussing the issue of making consent clear on campus as one of their political points. That’s why I believe there should be a recall election.
Not sure what this has do with IVP, or even CU for that matter. If this guy weren’t in AS this wouldn’t be controversial at all, but everyone wants to act like it’s a political game all of the sudden
The article says that IVP had this information before/during elections. If this was purely political, wouldn’t they have released/talked about this stuff then instead of after elections? Idk about you guys but I’d wanna know if my representative has sexual assault allegations against them, just like with other political leaders like trump, Biden, etc. we have a right to know
Let’s also be clear Daily Nexus refused to write this article a while back. They got the same email and I’ve also heard they received other emails. So IVP didn’t really have a choice as to whether or not make political.
lol of course they did. everyone always has a choice.
A choice to let potential abusers in power — nice.
So we should be basing our decisions off of “potentially”. Lol great
So if your friend was potentially assaulting people you wouldn’t care to know…or your president?
No. “Potential” and “Potentially” are precisely that. Vague accusations with no supporting evidence such as DNA or a sexual assault examination. I don’t automatically believe so called survivors because – shock – they might be lying. Let’s allow the investigation to take its course before passing judgment, shall we?
you clearly don’t understand how SA cases work so let’s stop pretending, shall we? “DNA” are you kidding me? A lot of survivors don’t really think about pulling a strand of hair from their abuser while being assaulted ?? While yes, there have been cases of people lying about being assaulted that does not mean you shouldn’t automatically believe survivors — what a fucked up mentality to live with. Also until you have had to undergo a Title IX investigation yourself, you have no business running your mouth about what these cases entail period
Perhaps you should take your own advice and shut the fuck up.
^uneducated mfs like these get so butthurt when someone offers criticism LMAO
Wanted to say no but was too drunk to say the word. Lol
If they clearly remember the whole event and even began consentually its not rape just cause you regret it
Being drunk doesn’t excuse you of responsibility. If I get drunk and run over and kill 2 people in going to jail. But if I get drunk and fuck someone ( or in this case get drunk and some guy grabs my dick ) I can just wake up and be like nah I dont wanna do that no more
You can’t drive if you’re drunk, just like you can’t give consent if you’re drunk
wow that’s crazy !! you must have an AWESOME tolerance if you’re blacking out but can just ~magically~ wake up and say “hey stop assaulting me” bc that’s TOTALLY how assault goes down ! too bad we can’t all be Jesus Montezuma and just ask our predators to stop nicely )):
That argument works if the person who commits the sexual assault was drunk. THEN you’d say that being drunk doesn’t take away guilt. But I don’t see how being drunk or not makes a difference if you are the victim
Y’all are really dumb. You’ve obviously never blacked out if u think u clearly remember the events Tje “victim” here claims they perfectly remember the events so they didnt black out. Secondly u can drive drunk we have all seen people do it so the argument is that if ur responsible for the deaths u cause while drunk driving because u choose to drive means being drunk doesnt excuse ur choices. The “victim” here chose to go to this guys place they chose to undress infront of them and they chose to not say no, they clearly admit that they… Read more »
As someone who has been in a similar situation, this is not how that works. Lmk, when it has happened to you. You clearly don’t understand consent, Jesus does this mean you will feel fine taking advantage of someone when they’re drunk?
Ive had plenty of sex while drunk. Although I regretted some of those, I never claimed to being raped
So you have plenty of drunk sex and don’t think consent is relevant to intoxication. What a great combo for the people who meet you.
So youve never had sex after a night of drinking?
So you have plenty of drunk sex and DON’T THINK CONSENT IS RELEVANT TO INTOXICATION. What a great COMBO for the people who meet you.
People are only calling out the Nexus because they don’t like to hear their golden boy fall from grace. Apparently everyone wants to “believe victims” until someone popular is accused. We’ve seen it before, we’ll se it again.
“believe victims” is fake bullshit people say when it benefits them. in this case its clearly benefiting one side. in biden’s case its not. its all fake.
“fake bullshit” you are disgusting. people like you are the reason survivors never get justice. fuck off.
This article isn’t giving a judgement, just stating facts. That’s what a news organization is for lmao I don’t get your outrage.
After all the people who were deprived of their due process rights in Title IX tribunals that UCSB student government did precisely nothing for, you deserve what you get.
You guys endorsed him even though you received emails about the allegations…
tea
That was before this came out. This article is more than CU can say though.
wow
Lol.. what if he does end up being innocent after all? then what ? Not saying that he is or isn’t because obviously this is a very serious topic that is being dealt with, I’m just curious
.
Then how they have treated the issue and how they’ve tried to cover it up will still be an issue.
Can we just talk about how they may be falsely accusing a black man of something that they got from an email that was sent from the opposing political party? We all know IVP is trash but this is a whole other level. IVP was really so upset about loosing that they had to do this shit?
Fr that’s hella sketchy from the IVP side. A email all of a SUDDEN was sent to all political parties right when voting started. I know they were all big mad when they lost majority of the seats in the senate and along side the president position. IVP is big petty cause they invested a lot of time in advertising for their golden boy just for what ? 😂😂😂😂
IVP is a party mostly of minorities…
Not one of CU’s exec candidates were white?
Tianna White bro. It’s literally in the name lol
She’s literally Asian American. What’s wrong with people
privilege check
This is the same argument made in the case of Reade and Ford. Realistically there is never a convenient time to come foward about experiencing sexual assualt. In this case and many others, it gets to a point where survivors sacrifice their own safety by comig foward in an attempt to prevent predators from achieveing positions of power. Many survivors suffer in silence until they realize that coming foward might prevent future abuse from happening. Coming from a survivor myself, please don’t be so quick to write off the allegations as a IVP smear campaign. It’s extremely disrespectful to survivors,… Read more »
Unless you’re in IVP and have the full story, don’t pretend like you know shit lmao
Daily Nexus is reporting the facts without accusing anyone. The large issue here was that this was going on before voting began, however CU chose to stand together to cover it up until after the election while preaching to believe survivors. They all consciously did it and to this day most are choosing to give no response as a response.
Can we just talk about how that clout chaser Izzy girl who created Gauchso 4 Transparency is trying to weaponize survivors to become famous? Also, who is going to call out of the fact THAT TWO OF IVP’S ELECTED EXECS BOTH SEXUALLY ASSUALTED SOMEONE?
Yeah, did you see that she also followed that predator just to get more “information” so she could try to go viral?
THIS. I was thinking the same thing!! It really seems like she cares more about getting her name published and recognition by making sure people on Twitter know she started a movement than about actual transparency or supporting survivors. What are you gonna do, use this as a resume builder?! Absolutely disgusting.
I am a survivor and I feel very uncomfortable with this girls account. Also she shouldn’t be using this issue as a way to promote her favorite political party? What survivors go through is enough. We dont need some girl who just wants clout using our experiences.
I am also a survivor and personally, I think what the work she’s doing is incredibly necessary. Each to their own but to speak on behalf of all survivors is harmful.
Let’s be clear, Gauchos 4 Transparency is nonpartisan. Also, I would like to mention that pretty same size of following on this account compared to the parties, not to mention the diversity of students involved. It is only growing, so reminder, it’s not one person. It is a collective movement. There is support from CU within and dissonance with people in IVP. I have seen and heard a lot of POVs. The reason this started was beyond politics – I felt betrayed by our representatives and a lack of transparency. I have never been involved in any org or student… Read more »
Please continue to explain how you’re not making this about yourself when you replied to a random person’s tweet all the way from 2014 who posted about the (trigger warning) – shooting in IV asking them to join YOUR movement now in 2020?! You literally said “I have taken it upon MYSELF to advocate for students – please check out my movement, we need your help” etc… That’s in such poor taste to use the shooting as a buzz word to gain followers/support and get RT’ed because that experience was traumatic enough to remind that person of, and then to… Read more »
I am also a survivor and she clearly does not take a stand between parties, only calling out select people who are part of the problem, not the parties themselves. Maybe you should try to some good communication with her before assuming it’s a resume builder? People feel very strongly about this issue and I’m glad someone started something. It’s more than the rest of us can say.
Have you seen her Twitter? She made an entire infographic/various tweets calling out CU by name, and describing why she thinks CU, as a whole, is incompetent, don’t believe survivors, and the whole party needs to be punished basically, while praising IVP for their “transparency” even though IVP hid two title 9 cases of their execs last year for over 5 months, elected someone who has not even a student, and ran someone who had gone to jail for DUI/domestic violence and continues to associate with those people. That’s the entire problem – if this was just about survivors/the issue,… Read more »
Have you scrolled through any of the Gauchos 4 Transparency insta post graphics? lol 90% are about CU as a whole, not even Daev, just CU lol and one of her reasons that CU is “problematic” is solely bc they are more associated with Greek Life which she conflates to mean they are more likely to cover up sexual assault bc she says that Greek Life does, huh???
they are probably about CU because CU senators don’t do shit and are the most unproductive members in Associated Students…if the shoe fits !
Ah exactly, there it is. Thank you for proving OP’s point. This IS about CU and party politics, not survivors or “transparency”
If Campus United Senators were unproductive, the international Senator seats would not exist.
good thing they accomplished that! now you have something positive to say about them as their president is finally revealed as an “alleged” predator
CU also takes the same stance as Trump in supporting Isreal.
CU also is the only AS Party that supports international students.
where did u get that idea? out of ur ass? please name an instance where a party on campus has not supported international students
Campus United is the only party that has ever nominated international students to run for Senate, was the party that created two international Senate seats, and we all know many students are xenophobic against international students.
are you talking about Aimee wang?? I’m pretty sure they “nominated” her because she’s in AXO and so is half of CU bc they love running greek life and that sorority is a cult who has “voting sessions” in which its leaders tell its members to vote down the ballot for CU (and I know this bc I was in that voting session)…I remember they didnt even let IVP come and speak at their meeting. felt like voter suppression but that’s just one view
FYI the entire senate voted for the international student seats (that includes IVP and CU folks), get ur facts right and stop creating false narratives
But who wrote the international student Senator bill? Also you’re forgetting Bruce Fan. Also good for u on marginalizing a member of the community.
Literally wtf? What does any of this have to do with Israel at all? If anyone doesn’t think this whole thing is about party politics and engaging in personal attacks and vendettas rather than fighting for a cause, here’s your proof.
Yo, this Gauchos 4 Transparency girl is crazy. Nobody believes your shit and you seem so bias. You’re not even going to acknowledge that countless predators that have been elected by the Isla Vista Party? Only Campus United? Seems a bit off
^ literally where was this energy last year when IVP knew and kept actual Title IX accusations against 2 !!! of their execs secret for over 5 MONTHS before they decided to finally post about them. Y’all were REAL QUIET for your fave party then. I didn’t see any of the people in IVP calling their own out. AS is a whole ass mess, but let’s not play favorites here and act like IVP has done anything for survivors besides manipulate a carefully calculated political move.
IVP is disgusting and they always use people outside of their party to advance their agenda to try and make up for the fact that they always loose. And the one time they didnt loose two of their members had title IX allegations and another went to jail.
and there were daily nexus articles about those cases as well. so are we supposed to excuse daevionne’s actions/ allegations and not hold him to the same standard as we did the IVP exec members?
Not referring to the Nexus, referring to the Gauchos 4 Transparency person who is praising IVP and acting like they are transparent and role models when 1) they failed to be transparent for half a year when it involved them 2) continued to associate with those problematic people and 3) only posted the email for political motives not for survivors. I don’t remember anyone starting a movement or harassing any IVP members/senators/execs last year when they actually had direct knowledge and verified Title IX cases rather than an anonymous email the night before voting opened. If they’re going to make… Read more »
^thank for saying what everyone was thinking. TBH everyone I have spoken to about this is literally thining the same thing. They may be loud but this girl looks like a fool and someone who is only out for their own interest. One of my friends was a survivor from an IVP person and she has yet to acknowledge what they have done. I wont start actually taking her seriously until she stops being so biased. Also bullying people and harassment is what she is doing. She is so in the cahoots with IVP people. It just looks so tacky
So to be clear, we shouldn’t be holding any standards because of IVP’s past?
Not sure if you’re intentionally missing the point bc no one ever said that ^ the point is if you’re going to make a page calling for transparency and accountability, you shouldn’t be thanking and praising a party that does a ton of shady shit and literally is guilty of the exact thing you’re claiming to stand for – call them out too, harass them as well, or at the very LEAST don’t thank/praise them for weaponizing survivors when they failed to act when it actually involved them
They distanced themselves from that person afterward. And you still didn’t answer the question.
At this point, you must be trolling or have 0 reading comprehension skills. It’s been answered 3 times but here’s a 4th. Majority of IVP members individually continue to associate. 2nd, hold all the standards you want, call out all the people you want, but make sure you’re ACTUALLY being transparent by shedding the same light on IVP’s actions as well and not ignoring the fact they did the exact thing you claim to be fighting against while pretending they’re champions for survivors. It seems like a personal vendetta, not accountability when you’re this biased.
Did everyone hear that the Izzy girl who created Gauchos 4 Transparency did IVP’s graphics. HAHAHAH to think she even really cares. Does she see she they are just using her to get what they want?
They must also be using everyone with the decency to appreciate the voters knowing the truth.
They aren’t using her, IVP senators are the only people that had the courtesy and decency to reply to a concerned student
A minority of CU Senators did as well…, and some IVP Senators did not reply as well.
So if IVP knew there were allegations brought up against him before all this, why was it not brought into light so that it could be investigated into earlier. This is unfair for all party’s involved and both parties should be ashamed of themselves. Their supporters and ‘leader’ are no different than the disgraceful ones we currently have in D.C
Beasly is going to be found guilty. He should transfer.
I lived in Daevionne’s res hall freshman year. I know this happened, because after he did it, he told a mutual friend that he felt bad. This friend later told me EVERYTHING. Horrified was an understatement. You can choose to believe survivors, choose to believe him. Argue about party politics. But believe me- this is 100% real, and the only reason I know is because it came straight out of his mouth. He knows it, all my friends know it. Time’s up homie.
See this I believe…
I’ve heard stories from people who went to DC with him this year that he was just really prioritizing getting extremely drunk alone with people.
Yeah why don’t you send another fake anonymous email to everyone again? If thats true then why are you anonymous? Troll.
“fake anonymous email” what a way to say fuck you to survivors who are terrified of their predator
And not even having the bravery to say fuck you to survivors unanonymously loll, this hypocrite.
Dude I feel so bad for everyone who has to deal with this. The truth will come out, and Daevionne’s “anonymous” friends who keep coming out and absolutely slandering the survivors will be CAUGHT and PUNISHED. Sorry guys, you are wrong this time :-)