
Assemblyman Das Williams, right, introduced AB 3 to the California State Assembly yesterday, which aims to establish Isla Vista as a community service district. Photo courtesy of the Office of Assemblyman Das Williams
Assembly Bill 3, a bill aimed to create the Isla Vista Community Services District (CSD) in order to provide infrastructure and services to the residents of I.V., was introduced to the California State Assembly yesterday by Assemblymember Das Williams.
The establishment of greater self-governance for I.V. has been discussed in the community for decades, but has become a more pressing issue since the occurrence of events such as multiple sexual assaults, April’s Deltopia riots and the May 23 mass murder. The bill was authored by Williams, who grew up in I.V., an unincorporated area with 20,000 residents situated on less than one square mile.
Williams said the bill would be building off previously passed legislation that established I.V. as a CSD over 30 years ago and would provide more specificity as to the structure and operation of I.V. as a CSD.
“We would have to spell it out more than that previous legislation did,” Williams said. “I think that it is in the interests of the people of Isla Vista … as well as the state of California … that provides balance.”
In 1972, when the legislature authorized the establishment of the Isla Vista College Community Services District (IVCCSD), the resulting proposal establishing I.V. as a CSD went before the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO), which did not approve the authorization.
Williams said having the legislature act to establish a CSD would provide more flexibility than the LAFCO process.
“State legislation, unlike the LAFCO process, provides great latitude in spelling out the specific powers of the community services district,” Williams said.
Williams also said that if the bill passes, and is approved by the Senate and Governor Jerry Brown, a CSD could be established in I.V. with minimal input from LAFCO.
“We could include some participation from LAFCO in the process,” Williams said. “However LAFCO is bound to only … approve or disprove a five member board that are all directly elected.”
According to Williams’ office, the CSD would have the power to facilitate infrastructure, utilities, garbage, police services, parks, recreation, cultural facilities, fire, security and roads. The bill, however, does not specify how these community services will be funded, although Williams’ office has stated CSDs are commonly funded by revenue bonds or special taxes.
Williams said the specifics of the CSD’s revenue will be determined through continued community dialogue.
“There are many ideas for revenue, some are less controversial than others, and that is why we really need a stakeholder process to really talk about what is the right revenue sources for a community services district,” Williams said.
Williams also said he thinks a CSD will be more successful than previous attempts at self-governance.
“We as a community can make that change but we shouldn’t be so naive as to think that we can do it . . . with what we have because what we have had before is not working,” Williams said. “When we had a municipal advisory committee before it did not work. Governance by the county alone, without the resources to do things particularly for I.V., has not worked.”
According to Williams, the university supporting the creation of self-governance in I.V. is a positive sign and a key difference to note when comparing previous attempts at self-governance for I.V.
“One thing that is really important that has changed since the previous attempts at local governance in I.V. is that the university, which was once an impediment to local governance in Isla Vista., is as an institution now arguing for local governance,” Williams said. “That is a change that everyone should have some hope in and it means that the aspirations of Isla Vista as a community may be able to be reached.”
According to Williams, the establishment of some form of local governance must address the needs of the variety of residents in I.V.
“Any local governance should provide a balance between the different residents of Isla Vista.,” Williams said. “Both what you could call the lower income ethnic communities of Isla Vista, the student population and the resident population concentrated out of the west end — there needs to be a balance between the interests of all of those parties.”
According to Williams, he and his staff will be asking for public comments from I.V. residents over the next two months to determine the specifics of the bill and said it is his “intention to continue the community dialogue that has already been taking place.”
“We will be asking for input as to what powers will be included in this community services district and how many seats there are, what their terms are, that sort of thing,” Williams said. “The legislation … would continue how it is with the added detail that can only happen after we receive more comprehensive and more specific public comment.”
Williams said that given the events that have occurred in I.V. in the last year, the time to act is now.
“There is plenty of time for further public input and for the stakeholder process,” Williams said. “But that given, the amount of human pain that has been experienced in Isla Vista in the last year, I felt that action was necessary and that we needed to begin this process and begin it now.”
The CSD idea is a non-start because it allows the County and UCSB administration to maintain their control over the police and the building zoning and compliance enforcement. The other concern is the CSD being used to fund the County’s police enforcement costs which one bad event could force the sale of all the parks in Isla Vista to pay for law enforcement. This would destroy what small remnant of Isla Vista self government remains in Isla Vista today…the IVRPD. Who wants to sell our park lands to appease his County and UCSB over lords? Not me.
Michael,
I would love to talk with you on the phone about all these matters. Do you think you can email me at IslaVistaCSD@gmail.com so we can talk?
Thanks,
Josh Plotke
Why? I talked to you on the phone around mid August 2013 when you contacted me before. You seemed convinced of CSD, so what is the point of discussing it more, unless you changed your unwillingness to stand up for Isla Vistan’s rights to home rule? Did you change your position on Isla Vista/UCSB Cityhood? That’s a Yes, or No question. That’s why I say you are weak. You want to leave it up to the UCSB Administration and/or the County to make decisions on the important issues of self government. Your not a leader, but a follower. You don’t… Read more »
Michael,
I don’t recall any phone between the both of us. I also searched my email archives and can’t find any email from you.
There really is no point in going back and forth with you on here. You don’t listen to people.
For a full reply to Michael, please refer to my comment under the article titled “A look back at Isla Vista’s Attempts, Triumphs, and Failures regarding Self-Governance, Part II.” But just to correct a blatant lie, I have never spoken on the phone with Michael. I did ask him to contact me by email, but he never did (other than an email I was cc’d on from him 1.5 years ago, long before any of these conversations). Here is my direct reply to your question. I am for cityhood, but because it is impractical, illegal and will never happen, I… Read more »
Josh, Your sending mixed messages…you say I didn’t talk to you and then you say I don’t listen?? That doesn’t make sense. Here is e-mails..including one I sent you about CSD and police.I don’t have anything to hide on this…. On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 5:27 PM, wrote: Sorry, I accidentally pressed send before I was done. Here is the rest of my email: Looking at the LAFCO report, what do you think about the issues they bring up with making a CSD? Are they surmountable? Is there any truth to the issues they bring up? Where do you… Read more »
Michael,
That email is the one I reference in my comment. That was an email dialogue between Carmen Lodise and I that he CC’d you on, to which you wrote a one liner. Next, I accidentally sent you the second half of an email that was intended for Carment Lodise alone. Either way, you never replied to that email. As I said, the only time you ever talked to me was a one-liner over email. There was never a phone call or any other emails, as you falsely claimed.
Josh, That’s not what I remember I remember arguing for around 30 minutes on the phone? Maybe it was some one else?Former A.S. president Jonathan Abboud. I am not perfect just persistent. If it wasn’t you I apologize for being a A-Hole…but opinions on CSD remain the same.
Correction:
An IV CSD proposal has never gone before LAFCO.
Gees Mike, you’re being awfully crabby. Josh isn’t always right but he doesn’t reserve the disrespect you’ve shown him in this interaction. To clarify, because an ordinary CSD can only raise revenue via property taxes, it’s unlikely to be able to politically raise enough funds to support a police department. And control over police is the most popular city function I.V. citizens have wanted through the years. My understanding is that Das Williams has introduced a bill with a utility users tax in support of a new kind of CSD, not a traditional one.
Carmen
Carmen, You wrote “Gees Mike, you’re being awfully crabby. Josh isn’t always right but he doesn’t [d]eserve the disrespect you’ve shown him in this interaction.” Maybe not in your mind but I get tired of so-called lip-service for self government in Isla Vista/UCSB without considering the unintended consequences of empowering those who oppress Isla Vista instead, that’s what I see CSD as. And Josh isn’t transparent and won’t answer direct yes or no questions because he is uncertain of his supporters. That’s what he is looking for…supports. I am not, I don’t give a damn whether people support Isla Vista… Read more »
Michael, 1) I am not understanding how creating a CSD is “empowering those who oppress Isla Vista,” when it will give Isla Vista residents more of a say in their governance, services, and infrastructure etc. 2) I don’t know what you mean that I am “uncertain of my supporters.” Also, you state that I don’t have a “solid position on anything.” You seem to have never read my op-ed that started this all. The title is “How Do You Solve a Problem Like Isla Vista” from April 21st, 2014 in the Daily Nexus. 3) A CSD does have the power… Read more »
Josh,
If you have a question please ask it and please answer mine when I ask. Then I won’t think your weak…or waffling or looking for a position. Why don’t you support a City of Isla Vista/UCSB? What are you afraid of, if anything from City government? Do you believe either the County or UCSB Admin should be able to veto Cityhood for Isla Vista/UCSB or should that be up to the voters in those precincts? Why? Please explain.
Michael,
I can’t go back and forth with you. I have other things to do. I did send you an email with my phone number offering to talk to you on the phone to discuss these things. I think we can cover a lot more ground a lot quicker that way. I don’t know if you have read that email yet, but I haven’t heard back from you.
Josh, I am about being transparent. When I screw up I admit it. If I e-mail you personally our conversation isn’t transparent then is it? Also I have asked several direct questions and so far you haven’t answered one. So what is it you are trying to hide that you don’t want Nexus readers to know about? Your Profile on Academia.edu lists your address as in Goleta. Do you live in IV or Goleta? If you live in IV why do you list Goleta? That speaks to your motives here doesn’t it?
Michael, You might not be aware with the Daily Nexus Comment Policy, so let me make you aware: What is the dailynexus dotcom comment policy? We encourage all of our readers to submit comments on our Web site. Comments made on dailynexus dotcom are not pre-moderated, but can be removed if they violate the policy that follows. Any comment may be used in the print edition of the Nexus, and we ask that you keep your comments brief and on topic. We will delete comments that: • Attack, harass or threaten a named group or person unreasonably. • Contain advertising… Read more »
Michael,
Please also cease and desist your defamatory and libelous statements about me.