The Nexus has compiled profiles of our current Associated Students (A.S.) elected officials to reflect on their past year in office. Looking back on their campaign platforms, we asked our elected officials to tell us about their successes and shortfalls throughout their terms in office. The term in reviews for the other executives — IVP, EVPSA, S.A.G. and EVPLA — can be viewed at dailynexus.com.
Going into the 2019-2020 school year, Associated Students President Alison Sir — like many other student government officials — hadn’t imagined that she’d be ending her term in the middle of the coronavirus pandemic.
Sir, who has spent the last few months running her office from home, spoke to the Nexus over Zoom about her successes, shortcomings and what comes next.
“UCSB has given me so much, has given me the confidence, the friends, the love I needed,” Sir said. “I really loved this position.”
Sir ran on a number of platform points during the Spring 2019 election, focusing primarily on improving students’ basic needs. Her vending machine specifically for food insecure students — a project two years in the making — will be placed in Associated Students (A.S.) Main sometime in the next year.
She also continued the work of her predecessor Brooke Kopel in finding a permanent location for the A.S. Bike Shop. By the end of her term, Sir narrowed down a final location for the shop.
Sir’s Strategic Vision Task Force met weekly to reassess the Strategic Vision 2020, a project first started by 2013-2014 A.S. President Jonathan Abboud. The project aimed to revamp the way A.S. addresses the larger student body through increased accessibility, outreach and transparency, she said. Throughout her term, Sir helped to create Strategic Vision 2025, a follow up to Abboud’s plan; finalizing this plan will continue with the next A.S. president, she said.
But beyond the tangible projects, Sir said she was most proud of how she advocated for students’ needs with the UC Santa Barbara administration.
She pointed to her role in creating UCSB’s first Mental Health Taskforce, which held its first town hall in early February but saw a low turnout of students; her work at the end of winter quarter, when she helped students whose professors refused to cancel in-person finals; and her work at the end of fall, when she said she brought students’ concerns about the sexual assault allegations against members of Sigma Pi to the administration.
Sir said she was able to be a resource for students during Fall Quarter 2019, when UCSB fraternities faced several allegations of sexual assault either by members of the fraternity or on fraternity property. Many student leaders and groups criticized administrators for not being transparent about the allegations.
Sir said she spoke to several members of the administration about students’ concerns; the administration, in response, created a Safer Social Events in Isla Vista task force to improve safety at social events in Isla Vista.
Sir, a member of Greek life herself, emphasized that the task force still has a great deal of work to do in terms of making Isla Vista safer.
Additionally, when the end of Winter Quarter 2020 hit, Sir said she and her fellow executives compiled testimonials from students’ whose professors had refused to cancel in-person finals, despite the university asking instructors to make alternate arrangements, back when the university initially planned for students to return at the end of April.
Sir said she and the executives then brought those testimonials to Chancellor Henry T. Yang, who allowed them to witness calls he then placed to each professor, “trying to persuade [professors], ‘Hey, this is what students are feeling. This is a testimonial from your class.’”
She added that she spent her spring break “constantly calling the Chancellor, the administration and Marisela [Márquez]” to find out what was next for UCSB’s students.
Following all these conversations, Sir said she used an A.S. executive order to launch the A.S. COVID-19 Response Task Force to help centralize all communications and project proposals related to the coronavirus. The task force, chaired by Senate First Pro Tempore Tianna White and Sir’s Chief of Staff Adam Chohan, held its first weekly meeting on May 4.
The task force was able to grant Student Health money for face masks and help students figure out where to request additional grants from A.S. She added that herself and her fellow executives sent out a survey that was later used to create a list of resources specific to different student groups on campus, such as transfer students and undocumented students.
“40% of the job is showing up and being present with what students need in front of the administration,” she said. “I feel like I’ve definitely done that.”
Sir’s successor, A.S. President-elect Daevionne Beasley, was sworn in Wednesday night.
When asked about the recent allegation of sexual assault against Beasley, Sir declined to comment, and said the allegation “[is] not part of my term in review.”
On Tuesday, Sir released a statement on her social media accounts and the official Office of the President accounts saying she would be putting her social media accounts “on lockdown due to the extreme harassment I faced on social media for the past week,” an apparent reference to calls for her to address the allegation.
“I will continue to support and serve people after my term, but I will not respond to cyberbullying and intimidation tactics. While I have always been happy to speak with students throughout my term, the way in which I’ve been contacted and the words people have chosen to approach me with are extremely inappropriate,” Sir said.
Izzy Mitchell, a second-year communication and economics double major who created a petition to recall Beasley from office, said she has reached out to Sir both on social media and through messages to Sir herself, according to Mitchell’s social media account, Gauchos4Transparency. Mitchell has been calling for all A.S. senators and executives to release statements regarding the allegation against Beasley.
Sir received backlash from students on social media after putting out her statement, with several pointing to one of her platform points – transparency – as a reason why she should keep them open. Sir declined to comment further about why she put her social media accounts on lockdown.
this Izzy girl is literally using these sexual assault allegations just to gain name recognition and it’s so obvious. It’s so sad and pathetic to see. I hope she enjoys her 15 seconds of fame.
hi “becky” I think she just doesn’t want an alleged r*pist to be the president lmao
Trash – the article literally used her term in review to highlight allegations she had nothing to do with. The Nexus is an embarrassment to journalism
you must have blinked and missed the rest of the article… as well as the fact that SA allegations brought to her during her term mean she has something to do with them
Great work Alison! Sorry your term in review was used to give attention to the harassment you are currently facing, but we expected nothing less from the nexus! Your accomplishments will not be overshadowed by these dramatics, keep doing good:)
LOLOL I’m dying at how that Izzy b*tch wasn’t making any noise when Steven Ho and Mayela Morales were actually guilty of Title IX violations a couple years ago, yet she claims this isn’t partisan????? Get over yourself honey and sit down.
JOKE OF THE YEAR!!!!!!
She wasn’t even a student 2 years ago tf was she supposed to do advocate as a high school senior??
It was actually last year when she was a student… the Nexus posted it during Winter quarter of 2019. Either way, everyone knows you can’t go back in time, but you can chose to not praise IVP now when they failed to act when it involved their own party members. Its hypocritical and failing to be transparent when you not only ignore that fact, but go as far as to act like they’re role models for what? Covering up multiple instances when it involves their members but trying to call out CU? Well, duh.
ivp disaffiliated with Steven and Mayela. Why shouldn’t we hold CU to the same standard? And you’re going to get mad at a student for when she decided to raise awareness? It’s probably because CU pulls so much shady shit (like slating alleged predators) and she decided to speak up! About damn time someone did
Their official twitter around JANUARY admitted that they had direct knowledge of the instances and title 9 cases all the way back from SUMMER. That’s at least 5-6 months of not being “transparent” and then Steven himself said in the article that he no knowledge that they had “disaffiliated” until he saw the tweet aka they were gonna get exposed so they tried to cover their asses by claiming they “disaffiliated”, but most members stayed friends with him. yikes.
not saying they handed that well at all, but they still disaffiliated right? why doesn’t CU do the same…looks like they need an ass-cover too!
I don’t think the issue is about when one decided to raise awareness, but rather why make this political about the parties as a whole rather than focusing on the actual issue. Another issue is the hypocrisy and slandering of one party as a whole all over social media as rape apologists while championing another as always doing right by survivors, when that’s clearly not the case, and erases a ton of people’s experiences with the issue at hand. Let’s not conflate doing the so called “right thing” this year when it serves to benefit them as deserving of respect… Read more »
Awareness was raised this year because information was published and survivors came forward to both parties. IVP is fucked up for not taking more initiative last year, I agree, but parties can evolve and IVP was indeed the party that made the student body aware that student survivors came forward to voice their discomfort with the president-elect. CU stood by complacently and had no intention whatsoever to be transparent with the student body. I am glad that the predatorily behavior of IVP affiliated folks was brought into the light (even if it did take too long to do so), but… Read more »
I’m honestly curious, how do you know that CU “had no intention whatsoever to be transparent” with the student body when it had only been a week? If IVP waited 5 months to discuss anything even when they had direct knowledge from the people involved and confirmed cases? Is CU not entitled to a similar benefit of the doubt in regards to time to gather information before posting something as serious as this that can never be taken back? Consider if you would have also said that IVP never had ANY intentions to be transparent if CU had posted about… Read more »
Seriously? Half the article is about allegations that should be handled in court. Also allegations that came out after her term ended.. Stop treating this like kangaroo court, people have rights and there should be due process. Journalists should know that people are innocent until proven guilty. She isn’t a prosecutor and chose the right thing to do in waiting for the facts to come out, what a waste of words.
the allegations came out before her term ended and a real student leader would have addressed them with poise. you should fact check and hold the leaders that are paid thousands of dollars to a higher standard, what a waste of words.
Alison, a queen who got such amazing things done this year :) Such a shame that people felt it was ok to give out her personal phone number to people for the sole purpose of harassing her about a topic that she is not even slightly involved with. Really should have left the Izzy stuff out of the term in review since it really has nothing to do with Alison and her accomplishments. Boo you Daily Nexus.
can’t believe she ended food insecurity on campus with one (1) vending machine! go girl give us nothing!
imagine belittling an effort to help the food insecure! She never said she cured food insecurity sweaty but like go off!!!
i can imagine it bc i agree w that comment ! sis didn’t do shit
Perhaps an accusation of sexual assault in regards to the incoming president/member of Alison’s executive board is something that actually IS part of her term in review? Considering the fact that these allegations happened during her term and she could have responded to those students as quickly as she was willing to for her greek life sisters…. seems inequitable to say the least. It is also interesting that one vending machine will take two years and be located in a place that will be most beneficial to students in AS. “40% of the job is showing up” and it sure… Read more »
Please let me know how SA allegations that came to light a month ago have anything to do with her entire year reflection in her position. The term in review is supposed to be about her accomplishments while she was president or her shortcomings and things she could have approved upon and quite frankly allegations that have nothing to do with her have no place in the term in review. Go after the people and policy makers who can actually make a difference in the situation not alison when her term is ending and she really has no real power… Read more »
she definitely could’ve improved her response to these allegations though. if you’re an elected official, standing by in silence & complacency is actually a major shortcoming. these allegations do involve her as she is one of the most influential voices on campus and it is a shame to see her continue to support someone who has said allegations against him — however, that was not done because of party politics and her standing by her CU constituents. this could have been a really powerful movement had Alison ditched the party mentality for two seconds to address one of the biggest… Read more »
Alison’s role as a paid student representative is listening and responding to the needs of students. Students reached out during her term, she left them ignored. Her term consisted of everything from the time she was sworn in until the time she was sworn out. Thus, it’s part of her term in review, and is reflected as a “shortcoming” of failing to be accessible to students who are coming to her with SA allegations a month before she is sworn out. There are many other topics in this term in review that you could argue “had nothing to do with… Read more »
Alleged sexual abuser is our AS president 🤢 innocent until proven guilty but ugh why can’t they find a normal candidate. I’m disgusted
She’s a sorority girl and that says a lot. She should have stayed in her sorority and got drunk with her sisters instead of milking AS funds for bs reasons. Pathetic