The shock and pain of the recent terror attack in France has led to an outpouring of sympathy for the magazine Charlie Hebdo. With slogans like #JeSuisCharlie, the satirical French magazine is being turned into a symbol of liberal democracy and western values. Many have called on magazines to republish their most provocative cartoons, and already hundreds of people have taken to share these images online. As a Muslim American watching all this, I can’t help but be uncomfortable. The loss of any life is a tragedy, and the attack in France needs to be categorically condemned, but the idea that we need to rally behind what are not only offensive, but also racist cartoons regularly published in Charlie Hebdo is misguided.
The magazine regularly published images mocking people of all faiths and backgrounds, often featuring a number of crude stereotypes in doing so, including big-lipped Africans and hook-nosed Arabs. The most notorious of these illustrations were depictions of the Prophet Muhammad which were designed to be intentionally degrading and offensive to Muslims. The editors at Charlie Hebdo, and the numerous other magazines which regularly feature racist and Islamophobic cartoons were and are well within their rights to do this. By rallying behind the magazine and its images, though, I feel like too many people online and in the media are forgetting that we can defend the right to express offensive ideas and condemn those ideas as well.
One of the people who died in the attack was a police officer named Ahmad Mehrabat, a French Muslim who died defending Charlie Hebdo’s right to ridicule his own faith. Ahmad was one of millions of North and West African Muslims whose families have immigrated to France in recent decades after nearly a century of French Colonialism left their home countries decimated. In France, these Muslim immigrants now make up a poor community which faces systematic racism every day. It is this community that had been mocked in magazines like Charlie Hebdo and which now finds itself under attack in the aftermath of a crime they did not commit or support.
French officials have counted nearly 60 Islamophobic attacks in the past few days including mosques being vandalized, shot at and firebombed. Whether we choose to believe in Islam or not, by blaming a religion followed by about 1.5 billion people (the massive majority of which are completely peaceful) for attacks like the one in France and encouraging its disrespect, ridicule and belittlement, we contribute to an Islamophobic culture that further marginalizes France’s Muslims and justifies violence against them. France’s Muslims, like Ahmad Mehrabat and his family, deserve better.
Mohsin Mirza is third-year sociology and black studies student as well as the Director of A.S. Lobby Corps for State and National Affairs.
Moshin writes, “The loss of any life is a tragedy, and the attack in France needs to be categorically condemned, but the idea that we need to rally behind what are not only offensive, but also racist cartoons regularly published in Charlie Hebdo is misguided.” +++ What makes the cartoon racist? Just because the cartoon depicts what IS an everyday event in Islam does not make it racist, it makes it true. +++ How many school children does it take for Muslims to kill before you acknowledge Islam is a violent religion? +++ How many thousands of unarmed women and… Read more »
Please have a look at this 1922 image of French violence and atrocities, before you comment about “helpless French citizens” –
Moshin writes, “The most notorious of these {cartoons} illustrations were depictions of the Prophet Muhammad which were designed to be intentionally degrading and offensive to Muslims.”
+++
The only reason this particular cartoon was “notorious” is because Muslims went insane on its publication. It is Muslim’s inability to accept criticism that makes Muslims notorious, not the cartoon.
Moshin writes, “Ahmad was one of millions of North and West African Muslims whose families have immigrated to France in recent decades after nearly a century of French Colonialism left their home countries decimated. In France, these Muslim immigrants now make up a poor community which faces systematic racism every day.” +++ Is this true? What were these countries like before French colonialism? And maybe more to the point what of Muslim colonialism? What have Muslim colonists done to benefit Sudan other than to ethnically cleanse the Animists from that country? What have Muslim colonialists done to benefit the Buddhists… Read more »
Arafat, You know nothing about Islam or what you’re talking about. You literally have zero evidence to support any of your claims about Islam and therefore aren’t worth listening to. I suggest you educate yourself – because any person with even a SEMBLANCE of intelligence can understand that the actions of a minority extremist faction of a religion say nothing about Islam or the other 1.5 billion Muslims on earth. Also, if you don’t see Charlie Hebdo’s cartoons as racist, islamophobic, sexist, and everything else wrong and distasteful – then it’s a great indication of your poor, pitiful character. No… Read more »
It is no wonder that Muslims are so focused on Islamophobia. Lacking convincing arguments, charm and positive contributions to their surroundings, being feared is their only chance to gain at least some kind of “respect”, and to scare the less brave into not warning the world about Islam’s obvious genocidal nature and its prophet’s thirst for blood and underage girls.
Exactly! I haven’t met a SINGLE muzzie (even the moderate ones) that are concerned about infidel welfare. After every attack happens, they vehemently defend the Queeran and Mo-ham-head.
Hey Arafat,
You still owe me five bucks.
-Bibi
Hey Mohsin,
Shaddup already. Freedom of speech>your feelings. Unless, of course, a newspaper publishes a cartoon about me. You know, like the Sunday Times did the other day. Then fuck free speech.
-The Big Guy (with a bigger ego)
Mashallah an excellent article. I agree what you said. Islamophobia is a tool they use to destroy the image of Islam. What will happen if Charlie Hebdo drew of a Israeli zionist regime? Exactly, they will be kiked out from there offices. And they will pay a tribute too…
Syed writes, “Islamophobia is a tool they use to destroy the image of Islam.”
+++
No, Syed, Muslims constantly gang-raping women, murdering children, blowing up village markets, throwing acid in the faces of school girls…this is what destroys the image of Islam.
+++
Syed, several days ago Muslim jihadists burnt to death 2,000 women, children and the elderly. What do you believe this does for the image of Islam?
Mashallah an excellent article. I agree what you said. Islamophobia is a tool they use to destroy the image of Islam. What will happen if Charlie Hebdo drew a cartoon of Israeli zionist regime? Exactly, they will be kicked out from there offices. And they will pay a tribute too…
This is the kind of writing I would like to see more of in The Daily Nexus. Mr. Mirza succinctly reminds us that islamophobic terrorist attacks abroad affect our local community and that condemning an entire faith for the decisions and actions of a fraction of its followers is indicative of an ignorant interpretation of religion.
There is an inspiration for attacks like those on writers, cartoonists, and film-makers: France’s Charlie Hebdo journalists; Amsterdam’s Theo van Gogh; Denmark’s Kurt Westergaard, Carsten Juste, and Flemming Rose, and Sweden’s Lars Vilks — as well as the assassination attempt on the Nobel Prize winning Egyptian novelist Naguib Mahfouz and the fatwa for the murder of the British writer Salman Rushdie. The inspiration for this behavior is not that the Prophet Muhammad was lampooned or criticized or mocked. The inspiration for this behavior is that Muhammad himself would have ordered or approved such attacks as revenge for assaults on his… Read more »
Nice Keep writing!
It saddens me to see so much hatred towards innocent Muslims in France right now, especially since they could potentially be important allies in regulating the more extreme voices in their own communities. However, it’s time we stop ignoring the fact that Islam is a uniquely violent religion. The Koran specifically and repeatedly calls for the death of nonbelievers. http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/quran/023-violence.htm Polling repeatedly shows that significant minorities of Muslims, even in less radical countries, support ideas such as suicide bombing and death for apostasy. We rarely see this sort of thing from Christians or Buddhists. In the same South Park episode… Read more »
Watch this 3 minute video and see how O’Reilly categorically mentions that the Norway killer cannot be a Christian, and we cannot believe he’s a Christian “only because he says so”! Why doesn’t this apply to Muslims?
All Muslims know that the extremists and “terrorists” do NOT practice the true Islam, so I think we should stop painting a picture where innocent practicing Muslims are persecuted for no reason.
https://www.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=10155078915135434&id=732495433
Link here..the earlier one was broken – https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=10155078915135434
Bringing other religions down to the level of Islam is one of the most popular strategies of Muslim apologists when confronted with the spectacle of Islamic violence. Remember Timothy McVeigh, the Oklahoma City bomber? How about Anders Breivik, the Norwegian killer? Why pick on Islam if other religions have the same problems? The Truth: Because they don’t. Regardless of what his birth certificate may or may not have said, Timothy McVeigh was not a religious man (in fact, he stated explicitly that he was agnostic and that “science” was his religion). At no time did he credit his deeds to… Read more »
Arafat, You simply CANNOT let a group of extremists define and represent a religion. Haven’t you read about Christian extremists going on killing sprees? Extremists don’t have a religion. Tomorrow, if they start saying they’re Christians or Jews, will you believe them and hate on Christians and Jews too? How can you believe someone who kills people indiscriminately? JasonG, I’ve read the Quran myself and a lot of places where violence bad killing is mentioned, has a reference to the times in which the Quran was written/revealed to the prophet. Those times don’t apply now. I would highly suggest that… Read more »
The problem with jizzlam is that its founder was a violent, raping thug. It’s not just a ‘few extremists’. Why do so many extremists (16 million of them) find it ok to cause brutal destruction and mayhem while quoting the Quran…no other religions do this. There is something inherently wrong in the Queeran.
Arafat is right – Islam is a terrorist religion. The Quran is the terrorist’s guidebook. Enough said.
Stalin had Christianity pegged – opiate of the masses. The Crusades were a long time ago. Islam – how on earth do we define it? By all the good it does in the world keeping the masses in line? Or by the wing-nuts it using it as a rallying point to go on a rampage now? Can such a small world tolerate such nonsense when it can be exported so easily? Do we need to treat it like Ebola and eradicate it as a force for evil? Someone needs to step up and take control of this thing before it… Read more »
this is an awful article. victim blaming at its finest. islam is a cancer on the world.
To be honest he makes a lot of sense, maybe he’s a bit too extreme on a few points, but I feel the social democrat dogma that has allowed Europe to be overrun by a malevolent alien culture is much more poisonous and irrational.
Sometimes I’m even inclined to refer to my 1/8th minority ethnicity (jewish?) in order to self exculpate myself from making correct observations of the world around me. Does 1/8th count? Does it trump being a bisexual, seeing as that is only half gay? Maybe if I was 1/4 minority?