Earth, we have a problem. There is an elephant in the room, and it is on one seriously destructive international rampage.
We are now unofficially living in the era of the Anthropocene, a recently coined geological epoch in which humanity is recognized as a significant force in shaping global environmental systems. We have a lot of power, and it would appear that we are not using it particularly wisely.
They say that good communication is the key to a successful relationship. Evidently we need to better our pillow talk game with dear Mother Nature because she’s not impressed by our mediocre pickup lines and half-assed empty promises. There is a severe problem when it comes to how we talk about the environment. Now more than ever we need not only a sustained and productive dialogue about the future of the planet, but also a thorough understanding of the full-scale implications of our actions.
Evidently we need to better our pillow talk game with dear Mother Nature because she’s not impressed by our mediocre pickup lines and half-assed empty promises.
If you will for a moment, banish all your preconceptions about environmentalism and the waning concentration and unfathomable heaviness of your eyelids when you hear the terms ‘rising sea levels’ or ‘deforestation.’ Humans are selfish. Coupled with this, it is a sad truth about the human condition that we have a tendency to ignore large, multifaceted problems with all the tenacity of a stubborn child.
Let’s ignore the starving polar bears baffled by their rapidly melting ice sheets for just a second and harness the fundamental self-interest that remains an integral part of our very being. Let us indulge: How does this affect us?
In particular, following the terrorist attacks in San Bernardino and Paris, the political rhetoric in the U.S. has become even more heavily centered on national security; how on earth are we to keep all these pesky bomb-toting Syrians out of the Land of the Free? Meanwhile, drought cripples the Californian economy and communities in Porter Ranch and Flint are suffering adverse health problems from the continual prioritizing of capital over environmental and social responsibility. Yet the most hotly contested topic of discussion is the most efficient way in which to bomb Syria into a post-apocalyptic wasteland.
I am in no way belittling the threat of terrorism, however, the rhetoric surrounding it is utterly misguided and divisive. In the meantime, there is an escalating ecological catastrophe that has a far more lasting capacity to affect every facet of our daily existence.
I am in no way belittling the threat of terrorism, however, the rhetoric surrounding it is utterly misguided and divisive.
The U.S. Department of Defense released a report in July 2015 indicating that climate change poses a significant threat to national security — not just in the United States, but also across the globe. It is therefore perplexing that throughout all the televised presidential debates thus far — both Republican and Democratic — there has not been one single substantial question concerning the environment or climate change.
Candidates on occasion have addressed the issue themselves, but these incidences have been few and far between. Bernie Sanders has ranted about his allegedly absurd delusion that climate change is the single biggest threat to the American public, which was met with much derision from the far right. Meanwhile, Donald Trump has expressed a desire to abolish the Environmental Protection Agency in its entirety in the name of attempting to reduce national debt.
Can you imagine the looks on the Republicans’ faces when the U.S. becomes inundated with an influx of climate refugees just after they’ve finally managed to turn away the annoyance of those fleeing from brutal conflict and extreme persecution? In low-lying coastal areas around the world, particularly island nations, people are already being displaced from their homes as a result of rising sea levels.
There is increasing evidence that sustained environmental issues such as drought and exhaustion of natural resources leads to civil unrest and situations of conflict. An excellent example is the increasing academic research focusing the profound effect environmental stresses have had on the economic destabilization in the Syrian region. As it stands, we experience dire inequalities on the global scale, and these will only be exacerbated by climate change and environmental destruction.
The relationship that we have with the planet isn’t a one night stand from Tinder, a casual and subsequently disposable, no-strings-attached encounter; it needs to be one of mutual respect and longevity. Not only for nature, but selfishly for all of us as a collective human entity.
The relationship that we have with the planet isn’t a one night stand from Tinder…it needs to be one of mutual respect and longevity.
Next time you tell dear Mother Nature, “I’m an environmentalist because I wouldn’t want you any hotter than you already are,” make sure you mean it. There is nothing more off-putting than a sleazy line with no sincerity.
Humans are a bare skinned primate with numerous systems devoted to shedding excess heat–and none geared towards heat retention. The ways the human body retains core temperature are clearly designed for catastrophic loss and are not very good on survivability. extremities are shed, systems are turned off.
What does this tell us?
Humans are designed for a much warmer climate than is currently extant.
If your climate worrying does not start with this very important point in mind, it is nothing more than flailing in the darkness.
Please stop with this man-made climate change leading to Armageddon nonsense. Find another way to get Leonardo di Caprio to notice you. I will let the late comedian George Carlin explain my view on this nonsense: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BB0aFPXr4n4
I love Annie Milburn. But she is in error. Her passion exceeds her desire to examine the evidence. When this occurs — ignoring evidence to sound altruistic and liberal so others are pleased with us, we call it “virtue-signaling”. Here are some of things we know: • The most effective greenhouse gas is water vapor, comprising approximately 95 percent of the total greenhouse effect. • Carbon dioxide concentration has been continually rising for nearly 100 years. It continues to rise, but carbon dioxide concentrations at present are near the lowest in geologic history. • Temperature change correlation with carbon dioxide… Read more »
Annie states: “Can you imagine the looks on the Republicans’ faces when the U.S. becomes inundated with an influx of climate refugees just after they’ve finally managed to turn away the annoyance of those fleeing from brutal conflict and extreme persecution?” My friend, who has a surly disposition and keen wit, is one of those first year immigrants who “fled from brutal conflict and extreme persecution”. He speaks perfect English. Recently, over beers, we laughed about how easy it was to get him into the US simply by picking up on “victim-mentality” of Democrat politicians in a position to help… Read more »
I enjoyed your made up story
Denial is one way to avoid facts. But everyone sees through it.
I can’t understand how fundamentally warped your view of reality has to be to reject that climate change is a tangible issue for people across the planet. Nor can I really understand how you can then make veiled xenophobic remarks that don’t reflect fact but do a very good job of revealing how simple you are. It’s simply baffling and terribly sad. You shame yourself. If I wanted to understand the current development of the planet’s various ecosystems I wouldn’t be a complete tool and compare it to prehistoric dates. If I wanted to understand the evolving issue of melting… Read more »
Thanks for the brilliant piece! A delight to read, and important to heed!
Here’s the problem with climate change (curiously the term changed to climate change from “global warming”): it has been politicized. The science has been distorted and perverted, and it’s no coincidence that Annie’s piece also includes a hefty dose of politics. Almost all scientific government funding goes to scientists whose hypothesis is likely to “prove” the earth is warming due to anthropological activities. And the media doesn’t cover the issue (or any issue related to science) accurately. It’s really no wonder so many people are buying into human-induced global warming (disclaimer: it may well be happening, but given the perverted… Read more »