Apparent Reason / Opinion

Daylight Saving: Wasting Our Time

Twice a year, we Americans dutifully flip around the hours of our clocks — an hour forward in spring, and an hour back in autumn. Why exactly do we do this odd little ceremony? Daylight saving time, of course! (And that is “saving” without the “s”, mind you.) But why do we do this? Umm … to save daylight, right? So we can enjoy the outdoors longer, and don’t have to turn on the lights and waste energy? That’s what we are told, but actually, that’s not exactly the case.

Since its implementation in the early 20th century, there have actually been numerous negative effects that have come from our DST (daylight saving time) policy. In fact, a study done by some of our very own faculty here at UCSB found that this whole “springing forward” and “falling back” business is very costly. The study focused on counties in Indiana and discovered that DST actually significantly increased the resident’s energy bills, due to cranking up the heater in the winter and the air conditioner in the summer. They also found that all this increased energy usage meant more pollution emissions, and thus more of a strain on the environment. This extra energy use also translated into a waste of money that could have been otherwise saved if not for DST.

While DST was put in place in part to save the public money, most research out there can’t even come to a good conclusion on whether any cash is really saved, while others, like our very own UCSB study, declares it is doing the exact opposite. Furthermore, not only does DST do nothing for our wallets, but it actually harms our bodies as well. Following the changing of the clocks at 2 a.m. this week (the “springing forward” part), people technically now have to wake up an hour earlier if they don’t want to be late for their job in the morning. It might not seem like a lot, but for people in certain occupations, it can be very damaging. Individuals who work in dangerous environments, like miners, experience a noticeable spike in work-related accidents and death following this DST change. This is understandably due to sleep deprivation, which simply wouldn’t happen if we just left our clocks alone.

Say you don’t care about money or your health (you weirdo). Here’s another reason to not like DST: Not only is it not consistent around the world, but it’s not even consistent around our own country. This makes planning a trip or teleconferencing a coworker 1,000 times more difficult. You have to think of what time zone they are in, and you have to take into consideration whether or not their country or state recognizes DST. If that’s not bad enough, in one particular state, that sun-bleached land known as Arizona, time is not consistent within its own borders. If you drive across the Navajo nation from one side to the other, for a trip that would take four hours you would have to switch your clock back and forth a dizzying seven times.

When studies come out showing the harm that is caused by DST and, inversely, no study can dutifully show the benefits, why bother doing it? Why not have one consistent time system all year round, and just call it “time?” Wouldn’t it just make sense to look at the clock and know that, regardless of whatever month it is, you have something as simple as the time right? Free our clocks; let’s toss out the waste known as daylight saving.

Jay Grafft is just reeeally bitter about that hour of sleep he’s losing this week.

Print Friendly
Tags: , , , ,


  1. Phil, Ohio says:

    When you get to ones position in life, it really doesn’t matter any more.

    Will I go through this tonight?


    On Sunday and Monday its normal as usual and normal time.
    Sometime on a late afternoon I might reset the clock after I’ve had a few drinks before bed, or maybe not.

    You see I have nothing important to do or any place to be on Monday morning, so when it comes down to “what time it is”, it really doesn’t matter.

    I only have the one clock to set and of course the microwave and that is it.

  2. Now, please come up with a way to convince those knuckleheads in DC. Nothing short of a zombie apocalypse can get them to do anything useful for the American public. I like the story that DST is good for the farmers. The sun comes up, it’s time to work. The sun goes down, it’s time to stop. They don’t even need a clock. Funny, I can’t ever recall seeing a cow looking at its wristwatch and telling the farmer it’s time to do a particular chore.

  3. So if DST was abandoned… What would we set our clocks to? An hour ahead. An hour behind. Half an hour ahead. Half an hour behind.
    It is confusing but I just figured it out. My time says 5:40. Tomorrow, I’ll spring forward and it’s going to be 6:40. (By the way, im only up right now to avoid “losing sleep” tonight) So what is the time without any DST? Would it be half an hour ahead or half an our behind? 6:10?

    • I’m not sure I get your question. Daylight Saving Time was the artificial invention, or stated otherwise, the deviation from normal. So if we got rid of DST, we would just be on Standard Time year-round. Why would we want to do a half-hour change? That doesn’t seem like much of a reason not to get rid of it, but it will never happen, since so many other industrialized countries have their own equivalent of DST as well.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>