Widgetized Section

Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone

Author, Staff Writer Gives Lecture on Dangers of Climate Change

Acclaimed author and staff writer for The New Yorker Elizabeth Kolbert delivered a lecture yesterday at Campbell Hall regarding her recent book The Sixth Extinction: An Unnatural History, which argues climate change will lead to a global extinction similar to the asteroid that ended the dinosaur age.

During the lecture, Kolbert discussed her interest and experience researching climate change, specifically in relation to the effects of carbon dioxide on the environment. Increasing levels of carbon dioxide, she said, will continue to worsen the global climate until we are faced with the sixth planet-wide extinction. But unlike the external cause of the last extinction — which was in the form of an asteroid — “We, humans, are the asteroid.”

According to Kolbert, her book seeks to highlight the human influence on climate change by citing ways in which we change the atmosphere and oceans, supporting these statements with examples of places she has visited and how they have been affected by carbon dioxide emissions.

“The oceans have absorbed roughly one-third of the carbon dioxide emitted since the start of the Industrial Revolution … Every four hours, the seas absorb another million metric tons of CO2. The net result is that the acidity of the ocean has increased by 30 percent.” Kolbert said. “Under these conditions, reefs will become rubble banks by 2050.”

Kolbert said humans have altered the planet by disturbing what naturalist, geologist and evolutionary theorist Charles Darwin referred to as geographical distribution, or the natural arrangement of animals across the planet.

“Another way that we are changing the planet is by moving species around the world,” she said.

However, the author also provided example of species that have been transferred from one area to another, including the Asian carp, emerald ash borer and zebra mussels. In this way, we are “creating a new Pangea,” she said.

Third-year political science major Alan Tam said the talk provided him with a better view of the way climate change is affected by human actions.

“Previously I just assumed that greenhouse gases was the major issue and had forgotten that people were also a major cause of species extinction like introducing certain species to a different environment,” Tam said.

Max Golding, co-founder of local climate justice organization 350 Santa Barbara, said the lecture could help convince people to participate in grassroots efforts that combat climate change, as he said everyone can contribute to such efforts by making small changes to their daily routines, such as biking more and eating less meat.

“We need more people from the bottom, and especially from the top, to act as if we are in a democracy where they can actually participate and change things,” Golding said.

For fourth-year CCS biochemistry major Rachel Fleming, the talk drew attention to the need for people to be concerned about climate change and take action. She said most people who know the facts about climate change are not usually driven to action.

“I just think that by spreading awareness, like she was doing tonight, was a great thing for UCSB students and the whole UCSB community,” Fleming said.

Author Elizabeth Kolbert delivers lecture on climate change’s potential relationship to global extinction.

Author Elizabeth Kolbert delivers lecture on climate change’s potential relationship to global extinction.

Peter Vandenbelt / Daily Nexus.

A version of this story appeared on page 4 of Wednesday, February 19, 2014′s print edition of the Daily Nexus.


Print Friendly

6 Responses to Author, Staff Writer Gives Lecture on Dangers of Climate Change

  1. max golding Reply

    February 27, 2014 at 8:26 am

    i didn’t say anything the writer said i said. this is an example of realllly bad journalism.

  2. Rachel Fleming Reply

    February 25, 2014 at 10:17 am

    This detail isn’t important, but I believe I said I was a senior CCS biochemistry major lol

    • Daniel Slovinsky Reply

      February 25, 2014 at 5:26 pm

      Thanks Rachel, we’ve corrected it now.

      -Nexus News Staff.

  3. Alan Tam Reply

    February 21, 2014 at 9:27 am

    I was misquoted in this article. I immediately said after this quote that I now understood that the transportation of alien species to new environments by human beings was a major cause of this species extinction.

    • Daniel Slovinsky Reply

      February 23, 2014 at 9:23 pm

      Hi Alan,
      We originally had the full quote in the article, but the last part was taken out somewhere along the editing process. We’ve added it back now. Thanks for pointing it out.

      -Nexus News Staff

  4. Philip Haddad Reply

    February 19, 2014 at 1:01 pm

    Too many people are inclined to blame CO2 for global warming and acidification of the oceans. Co2 is a by-product of the burning of fossil fuels. Consider this. The primary purpose of fuels is to provide heat and they constitute 80% of all our energy consumption. The heat emissions alone are four times the amount that can be attributed to the measured rise in atmospheric temperature. This is fact! Where does the rest of the heat go? Some to the oceans, and some to the land perhaps, but it simply cannot be ignored! What then is the actual contribution from CO2? The scientists who were searching for the cause/s of global warming found the correlation between increased atmospheric temperature and CO2 concentration, and because of a previous bias declared CO2 to be the culprit. Their climate models, therefore, completely ignore a/the primary variable. With regard to lowered pH of the oceans I’ll simply suggest that acid rain from the burning of coal (SO2)may be a/the cause. This is hard to prove or disprove since the increase in hydrogen ion content is so low that a corresponding increase in sulfate ion would be difficult to detect.
    The impact of having CO2 declared as the problem is manifold. New nuclear power plants have been approved and nuclear power emits more than twice the total heat as its electrical output. Even worse CCS, carbon capture and sequestration, is being proposed on an international scale. This preposterous idea, by offering hope that this is a stopgap solution, will delay the eventual conversion to renewable energy. To lower CO2 by 1ppm requires the removal of 9,000,000 tons. At what cost for what benefit? Will anyone attempt to tell you? As much as we are adding yearly could we ever reach 350ppm? But never mind it’s not about CO2 it’s the heat. Don’t let people who are promoting natural gas kid you into believing that it will reduce the rate of global warming. Heat is heat although natural gas as well as other sources of domestic energy should be exploited to eliminate imported oil.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>