Widgetized Section

Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone


Local Organization Opposes Beach Revamp, Asks County To Reevalute

Kelly Lin

Staff Writer

A group of Santa Barbara community members submitted a formal complaint to the Santa Barbara County Grand Jury to stop the implementation of Goleta Beach 2.0, a plan to review and renovate the Goleta Beach County Park.

Goleta Beach 2.0 is a plan designed to restore the park through environmental-friendly means. However, the local organization Friends of Goleta Beach Park has stated there are better alternatives to the current plan.

According to Ed de la Torre, representative of Friends of Goleta Beach Park, Goleta Beach 2.0 requires the government to spend unnecessary amounts of tax-funded expenditures to renovate Goleta Beach. Goleta Beach 2.0 diminishes the value of the park because its high costs harshly impact certain groups, and there would be loss of 150 parking spaces in addition to other negative changes, de la Torre said.

“In our perspective, [Goleta Beach 2.0] diminishes the value — reducing parking [and] grass picnic areas by [over] 20 percent decreases recreational value…This is not going to be cheap,” de la Torre said. “A lot of people are going to be disenfranchised,”

De la Torre said the Goleta Beach Park is an important city landmark that attracts many visitors each year, so the group is willing to take whatever measures necessary to protect the site. He said the organization is drafting a formal complaint requesting the Grand Jury to reevaluate the plan, decrease funding for the project and potentially implement alternatives that Friends of Goleta Beach Park is offering.

“[It’s] important because it’s such a recreational asset in the community and visited by 1.5 million people a year,” de la Torre said. “Our goal is to save and protect the park,”

According to Second District Supervisor Janet Wolf, who oversees three county parks, the goal of the project is to improve the beach so that its recreational resources could be used to their full potential. Wolf said the public had numerous opportunities to voice their concerns regarding the public project.

“One of the things they look for is the impact of recreational resources. When the Board of Supervisors initiate review for the 2.0 project, there is a sequence of review process [that follows],” Wolf said. “The public was invited to comment and to be aware that the purpose of the review process is to investigate the impact of any purposed projects.”

The project is currently in the environmental review phase, and it must undergo many review processes before going to the board, Wolf said.

“We will also look at alternatives,” Wolf said. “The planning commission takes it and then more public comments and then it will come to the Board of Supervisors.”

Amber Geraghty of the California Coastal Commission said they will also take public input into consideration when deciding whether or not to approve or deny proposals. Geraghty said such proposals first come before Coastal Commission and then Santa Barbara County sends in applications to the Coastal Commission, and it is up to Commission members to approve or deny the applications.

“As for the complaint made by Friends of Goleta Beach Park, any kind of public input we would take into consideration,” Geraghty said. “It is very important to the Commission that we consider different group views of the project.”

Despite the complaint, 25 year-old environmental organization Santa Barbara Surfrider Foundation supports Goleta Beach 2.0.

According to Surfrider Foundation representative Everett Lipman, the Foundation has protected the coastal environment from construction damages for the past 20 years, with Goleta Beach 2.0 being just another addition to that long tradition.

“Our chapter works to protect the local environment, ensure beach access and preserve undeveloped coastal land,” Lipman said. “We support the Goleta Beach 2.0 because it will provide more sandy beach and preserve the park without environmentally damaging the coastal armor.”

Lipman also said the new beach park plan has been developed following California Coastal Commission guidelines and the plan itself avoids most environmentally harmful methods of restoration.

“The Goleta Beach 2.0 plan has been developed according to guidelines given to the County by the California Coastal Commission,” Lipman said. “[It] does not involve any armoring, and instead moves utility lines and other vulnerable structures further back from the ocean.”

goleta beach courtesy of countyofsb.org


The pier at Goleta Beach. A plan to rennovate the county park, known as “Goleta Beach 2.0,” has
recently been formally contested by various community members and the Friends of Goleta Beach Park.

A version of this article appeared on page 3 of March 8th, 2013’s print edition of the Nexus

Print Friendly


In an effort to combat spam, comments that include links must be manually approved. Comments will generally be approved in under an hour depending on the time that they are submitted.

Please do not submit correction requests in the comments section as comments are not reviewed regularly. Correction requests submitted this way therefore may not be noticed for weeks at a time. Please submit all correction requests to eic@dailynexus.com or to the editor of the section in which the story in question appears.

4 Responses to Local Organization Opposes Beach Revamp, Asks County To Reevalute

  1. Frank Bourbeau

    March 13, 2013 at 5:14 pm

    Enerpro’s employees (now about 30), their spouses and children have had numerous memorable company picnics at Goleta Beach park. These happy times might not have been possible if Goleta Beach 2 had been implemented. Question: do any backers of Goleta Beach 2 have children? I doubt it very much.

  2. William Smithers

    March 12, 2013 at 2:19 pm

    Despite Mr. Rattray’s apparent sneer (The Environmental Defence Center’s “mission of saving mankind from itself”), this organization has a remarkable record of helping to preserve the California coast from commercial depredation and to preserve its proper use and access by the state’s citizens.

    There is no longer any question that the earth’s sea level is rising, that its waters are warming – crucial factors in expectations of increasing tidal and wave erosion and of more numerous storms.

    The sewage and utility conduits at Goleta Beach need to be moved to higher ground for the safety of the area generally and UCSB in particular.

    Mr. Trautwein says that the buried revetment was always intended to be temporary and that its existence has been out of compliance with the law for several years. Is this true of false?

    In the Nexus article above, the organization seeking to have Goleta 2.0 repealed cites mostly commercial reasons. This is a very old story.

    I urge UCSB students, faculty and other readers of the Nexus to consider the interview of Brian Trautwein at the website of “Just Between Us!” (It includes video footage of the western end of Goleta Beach with extensive explanation of the features of Goleta 2.0.)


  3. Michael Rattray

    March 9, 2013 at 11:27 am

    Mr. Smithers, thank you in presenting EDC’s side of this important issue. Their mission of saving mankind from itself makes us all pause and reflect where we would be today as a nation in a democratic society. A visitor from 1990 would scarcely recognize Boston of 1630 that has more than tripled since 1630 through landfill.

    Goleta Beach Park is one of the very best reason we call our Valley, Goleta the Goodland! The rock buffer that Mr. Trautwein constantly demeans for the potential “scouring” effect of further removing sand deposits couldn’t be further from the truth. Our County Parks Department did an outstanding job from the 80’s through 2005 always placing these vital protection measures above the high high tide line. What Mr. Trautwein won’t tell you is that this means that through the four seasons of the year, and all the high tides of the year, these rocks are landward of the tide lines but are there for the ravages of future El Nino storms. There is no reason to destroy this 29 acre park which is exactly what will happen if these rocks, or any eco-friendly alternatives are always there ready to do their job for protection. I encourage all to go visit our park and just try to find these insurance measures, you won’t be able to as they are buried under five feet of sand, out of sight…we can have our cake and eat it to.

    We hope that all good citizens get informed to better understand both the science vs politics that are in play at this beautiful park.

  4. William Smithers

    March 8, 2013 at 4:49 pm

    A half-hour discussion of this issue is available at the website of the TV Santa Barbara television program “Just Between Us!”


    Click on the “Directory of TV Interviews” page, then on the name “Brian Trautwein.”